GhostBusters 3 Todo Depende de Bill Murray

hoy el director Ivan Reitman confirmo que el script ya esta completado y se le mando a Bill Murray con la esperanza de que le guste de lo contrario si Murray decide no hacer la pelicula el estudio ya fue claro de que no haran la pelicula no Bill No Ghostbusters aca el articulo original

Deadline just did a report on Columbia Pictures' struggle to get Ghostbusters III off the ground, with the highlight once again punning the blame on an unsigned Bill Murray. Earlier reports indicated Murray had recently received a new screenplay and now Director IvanReitman and Sony Pictures have no idea if the mercurial Murray will smile on the script they've just sent him. Without Murray, the studio absolutely will NOT make the film, which gives an extraordinary amount of leverage to a quirky actor who leaves financiers sweating until the moment he shows up on the set. It appears Murray is to blame. More inside....

Deadline writes:

"This is too big a project to play games. "The studio won't even think about forward on a $150 million film unless Bill has a closed deal and a commitment," said an insider. "It's too huge a risk to do any meaningful prep, hoping he shows up."

It has been 21 years since the last Ghostbusters sequel, which wasn't as good as the 1984 original and didn't gross as much. Despite that, Sony Pictures Entertainment has tried over and over to scare up a new ghost comedy that would entice Murray and his compatriots Dan Aykroyd and Harold Ramis for another encore. It has gone long past the point when a studio hurries a sequel to capitalize on the momentum of the last film and nobody was going to hurry unless a good script made it worthwhile, Sony has proven adept at figuring out problem sequels: for years, Men in Black 3 seemed unmake-able because of the battles between director Barry Sonnenfeld and producer Walter Parkes, a prohibitive amount of first dollar gross committed, and the inability to agree on a creative direction. When a good script finally materialized, Sonnenfeld and Parkes made peace and talent traded first dollar gross for cash break deals. The picture is slotted for May 25, 2012 release.

SPE thinks it has the same opportunity on Ghosbusters III, because of the script by The Office writers Lee Eisenberg and Gene Stupnitsky. Murray had been aloof about an Ghostbusters but Aykroyd and Ramis felt a thaw after the cast got together a couple of years ago to work on a video game. Eisenberg and Stupnitsky delivered the goods, and Aykroyd, Ramis and Reitman added their own touches before sending the script to Murray. The script brings back the original cast, who pass the torch to newcomers, which sets up future installments.

When the mercurial Murray does turn up on a film set, it's worth the wait. He's generating Best Supporting Actor talk for his performance in Get Low, and he was a definite highlight of Sony's Zombieland. But nobody envies a studio having to rely on him for such a big piece of business, because Murray moves to the beat of his own drum. Even trying to get an answer on Murray's thoughts conjures up the signature Ghostbusters line, 'Who you gonna call?' He has been without an agent for several years and doesn't have a publicist. He has an attorney but a call to his office was met with the curt reply that they don't talk to reporters. Bottom line: a yes from Murray moves Ghostbusters III right into pre-production, with shooting to begin as fast as possible. If Murray says no, the film doesn't have a ghost of a chance. No pressure, Dr. Peter Venkman."

Source: Deadline

sin Murray no seria lo mismo era de esperar!! ojalas todo salga bien y se lleve a cabo el proyecto ya que se merece una tercera parte ghost busters!

Bill Murray es un dolor de pelotas. Siempre lo han dicho y al parecer sigue igual.
Me acuerdo todos los problemas que genero solo para prestar su vos al juego.

Ojala diga que sí para al fin poder ver una Ghostbusters 3.

Me parece lamentable que Murray tenga esta actitud de divo, sin embargo también me parece que sobrevaloran su importancia, lo cual no hace más que alimentar su ego.

PEEERDON


cierto, tiene ego de divo, talvez porque ES -UN- DIVO :P

jaja ya se fan mode: ON pero es el unico de los cuatro cazafantasmas que ha estado vigente, y ha elevado su carrera de actor comico a GRAN ACTOR. Pero como dice en " Zombieland" tiene un pecado en su vida actoral y es "Garfield" ... no es posible que haya dicho que si a Garfield y se niegue a GHOSTBUSTERS 3, ademas tanto Harold Ramis, como Ivan Reitman y Dan Akroid son muy amigos de Bill, si lo convenceran... y si veremos ghostbusters 3..

Lo que me preocupa mas es el casting de LOS NUEVOS Y SUCESORES CAZAFANTASMAS... llenar los zapatos de Bill Murray y compañia no sera nada facil .

Vaya... pensé que era de los que daría más disponibilidad a un proyecto bueno como lo sería una tercera película de Ghost Busters...

En fin... veremos qué más dejan conocer...

la verdad que no la hagan y una dejan en paz a las franquicias exitosas de los 80 y le bajan su nube a murray y quieren otro pecado la pelicula del agente de caricatura dentro de su cuerpo no recuerdo el nombre pero la verdad esta del nabo, que piensan porque salio en perdidos en tokio ya es señor actor por favor hay que recordar tambien el dia de la marmota.

Grand Admiral Thrawn escribió:la verdad que no la hagan y una dejan en paz a las franquicias exitosas de los 80 y le bajan su nube a murray y quieren otro pecado la pelicula del agente de caricatura dentro de su cuerpo no recuerdo el nombre pero la verdad esta del nabo, que piensan porque salio en perdidos en tokio ya es señor actor por favor hay que recordar tambien el dia de la marmota.

aja, hay que recordar el dia de la marmota,



http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/groundhog_day/


tomatometer
|All Critics|Top Critics 96%

que bueno que la audiencia general le vale un pepino lo que indique el tomatometer . :megalol:

Grand Admiral Thrawn escribió:que bueno que la audiencia general le vale un pepino lo que indique el tomatometer . :megalol:

el USERSCORE en metacritic es 94%..

la pelicula costo 14 millones de dlls y en 1993 - con la inflacion de aquellos entonces y sin boletaje caro por ser IMAX o 3D- la audiencia general logro que la pelicula recaudara 70 millones de dlls... por cierto, comedia dirigida y escrita por egon spengler...

Directed by Harold Ramis
Produced by Trevor Albert
Harold Ramis
Screenplay by Danny Rubin
Harold Ramis
Story by Danny Rubin
Starring Bill Murray
Andie MacDowell
Chris Elliott
Music by George Fenton
Cinematography John Bailey
Distributed by Columbia Pictures
Release date(s) February 12, 1993
Running time 101 minutes
Country United States
Language English
Budget $14.6 million
Gross revenue $70,906,973[1]


http://www.metacritic.com/search/all/groundhoug+day/results?sort=score

ReceptionGroundhog Day was a solid performer in its initial release, grossing $70.9M in North America and ranking 13th among films released in 1993,[9] but did not achieve blockbuster status. It found a second life on home video and cable. The film is number thirty-four on the American Film Institute's list of 100 Funniest Movies, and was named the number eight Fantasy film in AFI's 10 Top 10. Roger Ebert has revisited it in his "Great Movies" series.[10] After giving it a three-star rating in his original review,[11] Ebert acknowledged in his "Great Movies" essay that, like many viewers, he had initially underestimated the film's many virtues and only came to truly appreciate it through repeated viewings. In 2009, the American literary theorist and legal scholar Stanley Fish named the film as among the ten best American films ever.[12]

The film is number 32 on Bravo's "100 Funniest Movies". In Total Film's 1990s special issue, Groundhog Day was deemed the best film of 1993 (the year that saw the release of Schindler's List, The Piano and The Fugitive). In 2000, readers of Total Film magazine voted it the seventh greatest comedy film of all time. The Writers Guild of America ranked the screenplay #27 on their list of 101 Greatest Screenplays ever written.[13] It currently garners a 96% "fresh" rating on Rotten Tomatoes. On Metacritic, the movie has a score of 72 (Generally favorable reviews) out of 100. It was also nominated for a Hugo Award in 1994 for Best Dramatic Presentation, but lost to Jurassic Park.




Suerte para la otra.

si tu lo dices...